Switch Language
Alt tag

Thrombosis Adviser
for Healthcare Professionals

Join more than 1.500 of your peers to stay up to date with the latest in thrombosis.

Sign up now!

Subscribe

See Also

Alt tag Alt tag

Peripheral Artery Disease: causes and consequences

Alt tag Alt tag

Coronary Artery Disease: causes and consequences

Anticoagulation and Cardiac Procedures

Print

This section covers cardioversion, ablation and PCI in patients with AF, discussing guideline recommendations and data from clinical studies

In this section:

Cardioversion aims to re-establish a normal sinus rhythm in patients with AF, either by:1,2

  • 'Stunning' the left atrium using an electrical pulse (electrical cardioversion) or
  • Using rate-modifying drugs (pharmacological cardioversion)

 

Reported success rates of cardioversion vary:2

  • >90% for electrical cardioversion
  • 40–70% for pharmacological cardioversion

 

Evidence regarding the factors that predict successful cardioversion is limited:

  • A shorter versus longer duration of AF was independently associated with success in several studies3-6
  • Lower body weight4 and pre-treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs5,6 may also be associated with successful cardioversion
  • Evidence on the influence of age is conflicting3,6,7

 

AF recurs within 1 year in approximately half of patients who undergo successful cardioversion.1 Factors that have been identified as potentially predictive of AF recurrence include:3,5,8

  • Decreased heart function
  • Increased CHA2DS2-VASc score
  • Age ≤65 years (rather than older)
  • Paroxysmal (rather than permanent) AF
  • Alcohol consumption

 

Ablation procedures are performed on patients with AF to attempt to restore a normal sinus rhythm by destroying the cardiac tissue responsible for the arrhythmia:9

  • Traditional surgical ablation has reported efficacy rates of >90%; however, this procedure is technically difficult and involves open heart surgery10
  • More recently, minimally invasive surgical procedures that make use of energy sources, such as cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation with pulmonary vein isolation, have yielded success rates of up to approximately 80%10
  • Catheter ablation, another commonly employed and minimally invasive technique, is reported to be effective in approximately 80% of patients and is now the most popular method11

 

The ESC guidelines for the management of NVAF recommend:12

  • Electrical cardioversion for patients who have recent-onset AF and are haemodynamically unstable
  • A choice between electrical and pharmacological cardioversion, based on patient and physician preference, in stable patients or those with persistent, symptomatic AF

 

PCI with stent implantation is a common coronary revascularization procedure. Approximately 3 million people worldwide undergo PCI each year.13 PCI is required in patients with stable ischaemic heart disease or ACS.13 It is important that patients receive antiplatelet therapy after a PCI to reduce the risk of future ischaemic or atherothrombotic events, particularly stent-related thrombosis, recurrent MI, or cardiovascular death.13 However, the use of antiplatelet therapy increases the risk of bleeding events. For more information on the use of anticoagulants for patients with AF and PCI please see the article ‘Patients with AF Undergoing PCI’.

 

ESC recommendations for atrial ablation12
Recommendation Grade of evidence
Catheter ablation is recommended in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF or persistent AF after one failed or intolerant antiarrhythmic drug who experience symptomatic, recurrent AF on antiarrhythmic drug therapy. This should be performed by an appropriately trained electrophysiologist at an experienced centre IA
Complete electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins is recommended during AF catheter-ablation procedures IA
Catheter ablation of AF should/may be considered as first-line rhythm control therapy to improve symptoms in selected patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF as an alternative to antiarrhythmic drug therapy, taking into consideration patient choice, benefit and risk IIB

 

Catheter ablation is associated with an approximately 1% risk of stroke or TIA.11 Anticoagulation with a VKA(INR of 2.0 – 3.0) or NOAC ≥3 weeks before ablation may be considered.

Following AF ablation, warfarin or a NOAC should be continued for ≥2 months, and the decision to continue therapy long term is based on the patient’s stroke risk profile. 12

 

The electrical or pharmacological disruption of left atrium function during the cardioversion procedure is associated with a 5–7% incidence of thromboembolism, including stroke.14 By contrast, the risk is approximately 1% with adequate anticoagulation.15,16

 

Current guidelines recommend ≥3 weeks of adequate anticoagulation before cardioversion:12,17

  • NOACs are recommended, and VKAs can be used if dosed to maintain an INR of 2.0–3.0 12,17
  • For patients with AF of <48 hours’ duration and a high risk of stroke, cardioversion can be performed immediately with administration of heparin or a NOAC followed by long-term anticoagulation therapy17

 

After cardioversion, anticoagulation should be continued long term in patients based on their thromboembolic and bleeding risk profile.12,17

 

ESC recommendations for anticoagulation in patients with NVAF undergoing cardioversion12
Recommendation Grade of evidence
In patients with AF undergoing cardioversion, NOACs are recommended with at least similar efficacy and safety to warfarin IA
Effective oral anticoagulation is recommended for ≥3 weeks before cardioversion in all patients with AF IB
For patients with AF of >24-h duration, oral anticoagulant therapy should be continued for ≥4 weeks after cardioversion, (beyond 4 weeks, long-term OAC treatment is determined by the presence of stroke risk factors) IB
In patients at risk of stroke, OAC therapy, whether with dose-adjusted VKA (INR 2.0–3.0) or a NOAC, should be continued long term after cardioversion irrespective of the apparent maintenance of sinus rhythm or ‘first-diagnosis’ characterization of AF IB

The ESC guidelines recommend all NOACs for pre- and post-cardioversion anticoagulation therapy.

The use of dabigatran for cardioversion anticoagulation was based on a a subanalysis of the RE-LY trial because a relatively large number of patients planned for cardioversion were included in the study:18

  • Outcomes among the 1270 patients who underwent cardioversion were similar to the overall population, and were not significantly different between dabigatran and VKA

 

Subanalyses of the phase III studies of rivaroxaban (ROCKET AF) and apixaban (ARISTOTLE) also indicated similar outcomes to the overall populations in patients receiving cardioversion, but there were relatively few of these patients in these trials:19,20

  • These analyses were limited by their retrospective nature and the lack of TEE data collected at baseline to exclude patients with left atrial/LAA thrombus, in whom cardioversion is contraindicated21

 

To date, there have been few studies regarding the use of NOACs during AF ablation:

  • A single-centre retrospective study and a prospective registry found no difference between dabigatran and warfarin in terms of the periablative risk of bleeding or thromboembolic complications;22,23 however, patients receiving dabigatran took longer to reach the target activated clotting time compared with patients receiving uninterrupted warfarin
  • In a post hoc analysis of the phase III ROCKET AF study, outcomes associated with catheter ablation in 79 patients treated with warfarin and rivaroxaban were described;19 the authors noted that long-term outcomes (>30 days) were not statistically different between the treatment groups before and after ablation

 

Prospective clinical studies have been conducted to prospectively investigate NOAC use in patients undergoing cardioversion and catheter ablation.

 

The X-VeRT trial of rivaroxaban (NCT01674647) was the first prospective study of a NOAC to report results in the cardioversion setting (N=1504):24

  • Following early cardioversion, four rivaroxaban (0.71%) and three VKA (1.08%) patients experienced a primary efficacy event; following delayed cardioversion the numbers were one (0.24%) and two (0.93%), respectively. There was a trend towards lower incidences of thromboembolic events and major bleeding events in favour of rivaroxaban compared with VKA

 

The ENSURE-AF study (NCT02072434)25 and the EMANATE trial (NCT02100228)26 have reported results ofwith edoxaban and apixaban, respectively.

 

The ENSURE-AF trial, compared edoxaban 60 mg per day with enoxaparin-warfarin in patients (N=2199) undergoing electrical cardioversion of NVAF.25

  • A reduced edoxaban dose of 30 mg once daily was used for patients who had a bodyweight of ≤60 kg or CrCl 15-50 ml/min
  • The rates of thromboembolism, as well as major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding was similarly low in both treatment arms, with a net clinical benefit of about 1% both study arms (odds ratio 0.5; 95% CI 0.19-1.25).

 

In the EMANATE trial, patients (N=1500) with AF undergoing cardioversion were randomizsed to receive apixaban 5 mg twice daily, or heparin/VKA.26

  • Reduced apixaban doses of 2.5 mg twice daily were given to patients with two of the following: age ≥ 80 years, weight ≤ 60 kg, or serum creatinine clearance ≥ 133 µmol/Ll.
  • Rates of strokes, systemic emboli and, deaths were low for both treatment arms , with 0/753 versus 6/747 strokes (relative risk, [RR] 0; 95% CI 0-0.64; p=0.015); no systemic emboli; and 2 versus 1 deaths (RR=1.98; 95 % CI 0.19-54.00; p>0.999) in the apixaban and heparin/VKA groups, respectively.
  • Bleeding rates were low in both treatment arms, with 3/735 versus 6/721 major bleedings (RR=0.49; 95% CI 0.10-2.07; nominal p=0.338) and 11 versus 13 clinically relevant non-major bleeding events (RR=0.83; 95% CI 0.34-1.89; p=0.685) in the apixaban and heparin groups, respectively

 

It is important to note that these studies, like X-VeRT, were not powered to show significant differences in either safety or efficacy.

 

The safety of rivaroxaban in patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation was investigated in the open-label VENTURE-AF study (NCT01729871), which was the first prospective, randomized study of a NOAC in this setting:27

  • Patients (N=248) with paroxysmal or persistent NVAF received rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily or dose-adjusted VKA (INR 2.0–3.0) before and after ablation
  • During the catheter ablation procedure, patients received intravenous heparin
  • There was a low incidence of major bleeding and thromboembolic events in both treatment arms, indicating that rivaroxaban is a reasonable alternative to VKA in the setting of catheter ablation
  • Based on the design of VENTURE-AF, patients should either:
    • Have a TEE and, after confirmed absence of any thrombus, receive rivaroxaban for 1–7 days prior to ablation and for at least 4 weeks afterwards; or
    • Take rivaroxaban for at least 3 weeks prior to ablation and for at least 4 weeks afterwards

 

Since the rivaroxaban study, open-label, prospective studies assessing the safety and efficacy of apixaban (AXAFA-AFNET 5 trial [NCT02227550])28,29 and dabigatran (RE-CIRCUIT trial [NCT02348723])30 have been completed in patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation.

  • In the AXAFA-AFNET 5 trial, patients (N=633) with NVAF with a clinical indication for catheter ablation received either continuous apixaban (5 mg twice daily) or a dose- adjusted continuous VKA (INR ≥ 2.0)28
    • A reduced apixaban dose of 2.5 mg twice daily was administered if two of more of the following characteristics were present: age ≥ 80 years, body weight ≤ 60 kg, or serum creatinine level ≥ 1.5 mg/dl
    • Heparin was administered during catheter ablation
    • Stroke or TIA occurred in 0.6% and 0% of patients in the apixaban and VKA treatment arms, respectively
    • Major bleeding, as defined by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), was reported in 3.1% and 4.4% of patients in the apixaban and VKA treatment arms, respectively
  • In the RE-CIRCUIT trial, patients (N= 635) with paroxysmal or persistent NVAF with planned AF ablation received uninterrupted dabigatran (150 mg twice daily) or dose adjusted, uninterrupted warfarin (combination of 1, 3 and 5 mg with target INR of 2.0–3.0)30
    • Heparin was also administered during catheter ablation
    • The occurrence of major bleeding, as defined by the ISTH, was significantly lower in the dabigatran group versus the warfarin group (1.6% vs 6.9%, respectively; p<0.001)
    • From the time of ablation until 8 weeks after the procedure, there were no events of stroke, systemic embolism, or TIA in the dabigatran group, with only one TIA event reported in the warfarin group

 

The ELIMINATE AF (NCT02942576) trial assessed the safety and efficacy of uninterrupted edoxaban 60 mg once daily (30 mg once daily in patients indicated for a dose reduction) compared with a (VKA) in patients with NVAF undergoing catheter ablation.31

 

  • The occurrence of the primary endpoint (death, stroke or ISTH-defined major bleeding) in the per-protocol population post-ablation (n=417) was 0.3% with edoxaban and 2.0% with VKA treatment
  • ISTH-major bleeding was observed in 2.5% of patients in the edoxaban group and 1.5% in the VKA group of the modified intention-to-treat population (n=602). There was one ischaemic and one haemorrhage stroke in the edoxaban group


For a summary of clinical trials that explored the use of NOACs in patients with NVAF undergoing PCI please see the article ‘Patients with AF Undergoing PCI’.

 

 

 

Next section: Other Options

References
  • Sulke N, Sayers F, Lip GYH, Guideline Development Group for the NICE clinical guideline for the management of atrial fibrillation. Rhythm control and cardioversion. Heart 2007;93:29–34. Return to content
  • Trappe HJ. Atrial fibrillation: established and innovative methods of evaluation and treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012;109:1–7. Return to content
  • Van Gelder IC, Crijns HJ, van Gilst WH et al. Prediction of uneventful cardioversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm from direct-current electrical cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation and flutter. Am J Cardiol 1991;68:41–46. Return to content
  • Frick M, Frykman V, Jensen-Urstad M et al. Factors predicting success rate and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after first electrical cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Clin Cardiol 2001;24:238–244. Return to content
  • Kuppahally SS, Foster E, Shoor S, Steimle AE. Short-term and long-term success of electrical cardioversion in atrial fibrillation in managed care system. Int Arch Med 2009;2:39. Return to content
  • Singh SN, Tang XC, Reda D, Singh BN. Systematic electrocardioversion for atrial fibrillation and role of antiarrhythmic drugs: a substudy of the SAFE-T trial. Heart Rhythm 2009;6:152–155. Return to content
  • Carlsson J, Tebbe U, Rox J et al. Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in the elderly. ALKK-Study Group. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausaerzte. Am J Cardiol 1996;78:1380–1384. Return to content
  • Falsetti L, Viticchi G, Tarquinio N et al. CHA2DS2-VASc in the prediction of early atrial fibrillation relapses after electrical or pharmacological cardioversion. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2014;15:636–641. Return to content
  • Robertson JO, Saint LL, Leidenfrost JE, Damiano RJ, Jr. Illustrated techniques for performing the Cox-Maze IV procedure through a right mini-thoracotomy. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2014;3:105–116. Return to content
  • Kearney K, Stephenson R, Phan K et al. A systematic review of surgical ablation versus catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2014;3:15–29. Return to content
  • Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA et al. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2010;3:32–38. Return to content
  • Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2020: doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612. Return to content
  • Banerjee S, Angiolillo DJ, Boden WE et al. Use of antiplatelet therapy/DAPT for post-PCI patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69:1861–1870. Return to content
  • Collins LJ, Silverman DI, Douglas PS, Manning WJ. Cardioversion of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Reduced thromboembolic complications with 4 weeks of precardioversion anticoagulation are related to atrial thrombus resolution. Circulation 1995;92:160–163. Collins LJ, Silverman DI, Douglas PS, Manning WJ. Cardioversion of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Reduced thromboembolic complications with 4 weeks of precardioversion anticoagulation are related to atrial thrombus resolution. Circulation 1995;92:160–163. Return to content
  • Bjerkelund CJ, Orning OM. The efficacy of anticoagulant therapy in preventing embolism related to D.C. electrical conversion of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1969;23:208–216. Return to content
  • Arnold AZ, Mick MJ, Mazurek RP et al. Role of prophylactic anticoagulation for direct current cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:851–855. Return to content
  • January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2019;140:e125–e151. Return to content
  • Nagarakanti R, Ezekowitz MD, Oldgren J et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of patients undergoing cardioversion. Circulation 2011;123:131–136. Return to content
  • Piccini JP, Stevens SR, Lokhnygina Y et al. Outcomes following cardioversion and atrial fibrillation ablation in patients treated with rivaroxaban and warfarin in the ROCKET AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1998–2006. Return to content
  • Flaker G, Lopes RD, Al Khatib SM et al. Efficacy and safety of apixaban in patients after cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: insights from the ARISTOTLE trial (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation). J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:1082–1087. Return to content
  • Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J 2016;37:2893–2962. Return to content
  • Maddox W, Kay GN, Yamada T et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin therapy for uninterrupted oral anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2013;24:861–865. Return to content
  • Bassiouny M, Saliba W, Rickard J et al. Use of dabigatran for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2013;6:460–466. Return to content
  • Cappato R, Ezekowitz MD, Klein AL et al. Rivaroxaban vs. vitamin K antagonists for cardioversion in atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2014;35:3346–3355. Return to content
  • Goette A, Merino JL, Ezekowitz MD et al. Edoxaban versus enoxaparin-warfarin in patients undergoing cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (ENSURE-AF): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet 2016;388:1995–2003. Return to content
  • Ezekowitz MD, Pollack CV, Jr., Halperin JL et al. Apixaban compared to heparin/vitamin K antagonist in patients with atrial fibrillation scheduled for cardioversion: the EMANATE trial. Eur Heart J 2018;39:2959–2971. Return to content
  • Cappato R, Marchlinski FE, Hohnloser SH et al. Uninterrupted rivaroxaban vs. uninterrupted vitamin K antagonists for catheter ablation in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2015;36:1805–1811. Return to content
  • Kirchhof P, Haeusler KG, Blank B et al. Apixaban in patients at risk of stroke undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. Eur Heart J 2018: doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy176. Return to content
  • Di Biase L, Callans D, Georg Haeusler K et al. Rationale and design of AXAFA-AFNET 5: an investigator-initiated, randomized, open, blinded outcome assessment, multi-centre trial to comparing continuous apixaban to vitamin K antagonists in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Europace 2017;19:132–138. Return to content
  • Calkins H, Willems S, Gerstenfeld EP et al. Uninterrupted dabigatran versus warfarin for ablation in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2017;376:1627–1636. Return to content
  • Hohnloser SH, Camm J, Cappato R et al. Uninterrupted edoxaban vs. vitamin K antagonists for ablation of atrial fibrillation: the ELIMINATE-AF trial. Eur Heart J 2019: doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz190. Return to content

See Also

Alt tag Alt tag

Peripheral Artery Disease: causes and consequences

See Also

Alt tag Alt tag

Coronary Artery Disease: causes and consequences

Copyright © Bayer AG |

  • PP-M_RIV-ALL-0167-1

Updated date 10/10/2022

This website is intended to provide information to an international audience outside the USA and UK.

Copyright © Bayer AG |

  • PP-M_RIV-ALL-0167-1

Updated date 10/10/2022

This website is intended to provide information to an

international audience outside the USA and UK.

Bayer Bayer

Follow us